The Indianapolis Colts (1-3) are yet to come out of the AFC South table, but they could certainly take advantage of a win to stay there in Monday Night Football against the Baltimore Ravens (3-1) . Lamar Jackson has made a Herculean effort to keep the Ravens atop the AFC North, but he needs to keep producing to keep pace with the Cleveland Browns and Cincinnati Bengals. Caesars Sportsbook currently lists the total passing yards of its counterpart, Colts QB Carson Wentz, at 224.5 yards. Amidst Indianapolis’ struggles this season, Wentz has only managed to reach that number once in four games.
A complete computer model can help you objectively choose the right side to take on the many player accessories listed for Colts vs. Ravens and help you make long term profit. Before you make any NFL prop bets for Monday Night Football, you need to see the Ravens vs. prop predictions. Colts of the SportsLine projection model.
The model, which simulates every NFL game 10,000 times, is up nearly $ 7,900 per 100 players on the NFL’s top picks since its inception over six years ago. Last season, he made 24-14 on the NFL’s top picks, grossing over $ 800. The model also enters Week 5 of the 2021 season on an incredible 124-82 run on the NFL’s top picks stretching back to the 2017 season.
The model has also ranked in the top 10 on NFLPickWatch four of the past five years on NFL direct picks and has beaten over 94% of CBS Sports Football Pick’em players four times during that time. Whoever followed him is very high.
It can also be used to overwrite NFL prop choices. Last season the accessory picks increased to 389-310, grossing over $ 3,000.
With Ravens vs. Colts on Monday Night Football, the model evaluated Caesars’ NFL player props and found five solid bets. You can only see them here.
Best Bets on NFL Player Accessories for Ravens vs. Colts
After simulating the Ravens against the Colts 10,000 times, the model predicts that Ravens QB Lamar Jackson will easily pass 228.5 passing yards and finish with 255. In his last two games, Jackson threw for 287 yards. against Detroit and 316 yards against Denver. His ground totals have also declined over the past two weeks, due to a greater emphasis on the Ravens’ passing attack.
Jackson’s passing totals are significantly higher than last year, but Baltimore’s running backs have been wiped out since preseason. The Indianapolis defense only had to deal with 110 opposing quarterback pass attempts, which is the third-lowest total in the NFL. Those passes brought in 867 yards, which is the ninth lowest in the league. The situation is different this time around against a team from Baltimore who bases almost their entire offense on one player.
SportsLine’s NFL model also had Baltimore wide receiver Marquise Brown surpassing her total of 55.5 receiving yards. The projections see Brown’s threat as a big-game receiver maximizing his targets and pushing for five catches and 73 yards in the air. Brown has 13 catches this season all of which have traveled over 10 yards and may not need more than a few receptions to reach 56.
Baltimore’s top receiver is actually second among targets behind Sammy Watkins at his post, although the pecking order may change with the potential return of Rashod Bateman from the injured reserve. Jackson threw a higher percentage of “catchable” passes at Brown, and he leads the team far in yards after the landing. Even in Brown’s worst performance of the season in Week 3, he finished just three yards from the total he is set to reach on Monday night.
How to bet on NFL players for the Colts vs the Ravens
Plus, the model says another star easily exceeds their yardage total and has an additional prop payout that you’ll want to jump on. You must see the model analysis before you place any bets on Ravens vs Colts props for Monday.
Which Ravens vs Colts accessory bets should you support on Monday Night Football? And which star is a must-see? Visit SportsLine now to see the best Colts vs. Ravens accessory bets, all from the model which has gone up almost $ 7,900 over the top rated picks in the NFL.
